Reply to post: Re: 'None of the actors can be taken at face value

Decoding the Chinese Super Micro super spy-chip super-scandal: What do we know – and who is telling the truth?

Tinslave_the_Barelegged

Re: 'None of the actors can be taken at face value

Query regarding embedding chips in the motherboard substrate. Is this even a part of the normal manufacturing process? If it isn't, we can probably discount that part of the story as hyperbole.

That's roughly what I was thinking. Embedding a physical device, no matter how small or how smart, is such absolute proof of where the attack was carried out that it seems far too clumsy, and far too likely to be found out.

Still, as others have pointed out, none of the actors in the story necessarily inspire one with confidence of truth, while all have something to gain from being manipulative.

But overall, this sounds more like the current equivalent of a Red under the Bed hysteria which seems so boringly cyclic in some parts of the world, the Chinese being the bogeyman-de-jour. Where's Arthur Miller when he's needed?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019