Reply to post:

Archive.org's Wayback Machine is legit legal evidence, US appeals court judges rule

Loyal Commenter Silver badge

Explain to me please, why you think being owned specifically by George Soros would make something more likely to be faked.

Is it possibly because you disagree with the man's political beliefs, so wish to smear him?

Personally, I've seen no evidence, or even serious suggestion, that he is involved in any fake news sites, for instance. I'm not sure I can say the same for those who oppose his political views.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019