Reply to post:'s Wayback Machine is legit legal evidence, US appeals court judges rule


What gets me is he only got one year. I usually think the US gives harsh sentences but he got off seriously lightly in this case. Distributing malware, intrusion, fraud, destroying evidence? He obviously made some serious money out of his crimes to pay for some heavy legal assistance.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019