Reply to post: Re: The Holy Trinity

When's a backdoor not a backdoor? When the Oz government says it isn't

Adam 1

Re: The Holy Trinity

> They make the legislation apparently quite definite. Then subsequently they gradually widen the scope of interpretations of "terrorists, paedophiles and organised crime".

It already covers "protecting the public revenue", so add to that library/parking/dog shat on the footpath fines as technically meeting the criteria.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon