Reply to post: More in line with GBS?

IBM to GTS: We want you to 'rotate' clients every two years

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

More in line with GBS?

So I currently work for big blue, hence my cowardly name.

I started out in GTS and moved to GBS because after a few years plugging along in GTS it was clear that I was stuck in a role.

GBS on the other hand has huge amounts of rotation which does seem to keep the staff happier because even if this assignment sucks the next one is right around the corner.

Since announcing One IBM about a year ago very little has been done about about actually bringing GTS and GBS in line with eachother in terms of practice.

I would suspect that this is nothing more then a vauge attempt at best partice since there other divisions do it while making it easier to roll GTS up into GBS as the support/strategic outsourcing market drys up

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019