Reply to post: NAT makes IPv6 pointless

Internet engineers tear into United Nations' plan to move us all to IPv6

aberglas

NAT makes IPv6 pointless

There are not 2^23 *servers* in the world, and very unlikely to ever be. And the new TLS means that we can even support multiple servers on the same IP.

The world has worked around the IPv4 restriction. Get over it. And NAT ain't going anywhere, even with IPv6.

And a few billion routes is nothing in a modern router. If we don't fill all that memory up with routes it might get filled up with something far worse, like XML.

A hack and a fudge is always better than a kludge.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019