Reply to post: Re: NAT required

IPv6 growth is slowing and no one knows why. Let's see if El Reg can address what's going on

Adrian Harvey

Re: NAT required

NAT itself isn't but having clients on non reachable addresses *is*. It is because it prevents accidental exposure in a number of circumstances (Misconfigured devices acting a bridge is one example). And NAT enables that.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019