"You missed half of the problem. The above sentences finishes with "has the right to bear arms".
It does not say "Has the right bear arsenals".
Is that a legal interpretation? How can you have the first without the latter?
"You missed half of the problem. The above sentences finishes with "has the right to bear arms".
It does not say "Has the right bear arsenals".
Is that a legal interpretation? How can you have the first without the latter?