Reply to post: Another Speaker talking without experience

Agile development exposed as techie superstition

taddicuspaws

Another Speaker talking without experience

Sorry but Linda Rising sounds like someone that is talking about something that she has no experience in - and being a COO it is quite a possibility.

Linda uses incomplete examples and metaphors to put forward a lacking State or concept. Pretty poor actually, but it all shows she needs a bigger view on Agile and a better understand of how to be a proper COO.

Actually, 10+ plus years of working and utilising Agile concepts is a good enough dataset showing that Agile does add more value than old-school waterfall methods. Agile is after all, just 'FUNCTIONAL' Coding, breaking functions and features into encapsulated pieces of work (that also includes what is needed to make post-live support) and wrapping a pull process around everything.

BUT to move into a DevOps approach you need to get rid of Scrum as it adds artificial barriers to continual improvement. Kanban works better than Scrum.

Anyone that fails within Agile has a poor framework and management around them, so it's not their fault.

If Rising is a COO then she is a very poor one. The 'As Is' and 'To Be' Operating Models have nothing to do with Science, nor do the 'Agile' coded improvements to Capabilities - it's adding new "business benefits" to the Business Capabilities - all of which links to Strategy..

Project Work (Coding) -> Deliverables (Software) -> Programme (of Projects) -> New or Improved Capability -> Business Benefit

I simply feel Linda Rising's view is just wrong and based on poor knowledge and understand

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon