Reply to post: Re: Surely though

Zero arrests, 2 correct matches, no criminals: London cops' facial recog tech slammed


Re: Surely though

" ... Which is clearly bollocks. It identified 95 people from a crowd of hundreds of thousands. That's not a 98% false positive rate. ... "

You are right. But ...

... 98% inaccurate rate means that 93.1 ( so 94 ) people were misidentified. And the one that was correctly identified, was not a criminal. Making the use of it worthless. Period.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019