Reply to post: Re: NT2 easily identifiable anyway

How 'parasitic' Google's 'We're journalists!' court defence was stamped into oblivion

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: NT2 easily identifiable anyway

Amusing that,

NT2 being the easily identifiable one despite 'winning' his point in the court, yet NT1 being harder to put a definite name to from the available clues despite the court finding against him and stating that

'..The information retains sufficient relevance today. He has not accepted his guilt, has misled the public and this Court, and shows no remorse over any of these matters. He remains in business, and the information serves the purpose of minimising the risk that he will continue to mislead, as he has in the past.'

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019