Reply to post: Re: Compatibility

OK, this time it's for real: The last available IPv4 address block has gone

Roland6 Silver badge

Re: Compatibility

>Just go here please:

...whats-the-point-of-nat66...

No need for NAT in ipv6..

In some respects it is a helpful reminder that networking doesn't change very quickly - the article is from 2011, but still relevant; as are the comments.

I think we need to hold back from the "No need for NAT in ipv6" until we have workable solutions for all the various realworld use cases for which NAT has been found to be the solution. By 'workable' I mean solutions that for example don't rely on ISP's etc. suddenly waking up and deciding to be generous to their customers.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019