Reply to post: "a governing body who decides what is Better for you to be allowed to see. "

How 'parasitic' Google's 'We're journalists!' court defence was stamped into oblivion

LDS Silver badge

"a governing body who decides what is Better for you to be allowed to see. "

Anarchy is not a better solution. We have given ourselves rules because it makes society work better as a whole. We may challenge the rules, if they don't work or result to be bad. But no rules usually turns very bad.

Do you mean Google should be able to return links to illegal contents, because no governing body should decide they are not legal? Do you mean companies should have no ethics and try to understand the far reaching effects of their decisions? Why should Google decide what people are allowed to see? What's oversight exist on its operations?

"1984" is just one way how the world can go wrong - but not the unique one. "Lord of the Flies" is another. Or "The Circle".

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019