Reply to post: Re: Compatibility

OK, this time it's for real: The last available IPv4 address block has gone

Aitor 1 Silver badge

Re: Compatibility

IPV4 is in my opinion fundamentally broken for the use it has been given.

So no wonder they wanted to do something different, and prevent NAT. NAT lovers keep calling for NAT66, but that is unneded.

Just go here please:

https://networkingnerd.net/2011/12/01/whats-the-point-of-nat66/

No need for NAT in ipv6.. and this is not a mistake, it is on purpose.

Look at the ridiculous bottlenecks some mobile phone companies have in their CPDs.. that would not happen with a properly deployed IPv6 network!

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019