Reply to post: Cost

VMs: Imperfect answers to imperfect problems, but they're all we have

Pier Reviewer

Cost

Time is expensive. Storage is cheap (assuming the flash fabs aren’t flooded out again...)

Containers et al are probably a kludge, but it works. I don’t see a better alternative on the horizon at the moment. I think most organisations would prefer to buy a few extra terabytes of storage than spend extra time standing up/fixing apps. Dependency hell is the worst kind of hell. Containers can help to mitigate that.

Containers and VMs are also much more portable than running directly on iron. That means you can get more flexibility out of your hardware if you design things appropriately. Migrating VMs and containers around (or between) data centres tends to be a simpler affair than moving servers.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon