Reply to post:

What we call our mind and assume to be a consciousness or a 'life' formed over and against a largely 'dead' universe, may be a trick of the mind.

What would mind be - excepting that which matters to it? In other words minding is a verb for the giving of attention, the beholding of, or experiencing.

What we developed as 'communication' is based upon the predicate of separate minds and lives - but this is a predicate for an experience of Everything through a 'separated off' sense of dissociation.

My sense is that what we call sense is a mindset of conditioned rules that filter a limited and distorted perception (of Everything). The model works well enough within its own rules, but defends against any other perspective and so in effect quarantines or straitjackets itself within the idea of privately possessed or subjective knowledge, power and life. Disguising this in narratives of wishful thinking that draw upon symbols and derivative concepts of life in modelling such an unfolding experience.

That Everything (of which we have no power to separate from and thus define in terms of prediction and control) is always communicating to us in every moment or every thought and experience is blocked by the 'mind-set' of allowed discovery. That this nonetheless is the true creative, leaks into our mind, model and experience in events we assign to personal achievements and discoveries - regardless that this is usurping a native intelligence to 'scientific' rulership - and in historical terms is seen in the invalidating, suppression and denial of native cultural wisdom (ancestry) as the presumption of god (judgemental superiority) backed by weapons and false words (guns and laws).

The basis for communication is not setting the terms of the form of the answer, but of holding a true question and listening for anything from any vector that resonates to our communicated desire.

Fake questions are statements in the form of questions.

It is possible to confine and define ourselves within fake or substitute 'reality' as a way of persisting in the experience. But such a substitution is not aligning true and so is innately conflicting and conflicted. The investment and fascination in the apparent dynamic of conflict is in some sense a freak show for just how 'far out' one can go, into the idea of not life or non-existence.

Looking at All That is and proving non-existence is a strange 'victory' for the sense of lack that drives human development in terms of marketising and weaponising Everything that comes into our range.

For the More of What Is - to communicate to humans - directly, would generate psychotic reaction.

That is, it would serve only to further distantiate. And so leaking into the minds where willingness does not reject occurs over gradual steps toward a qualitative shift of recognition.

'Physical' experience is a true result for the questions or desires that are given forth. Except in the bubble of a fake world, we know not what our unconscious or denied sense of native being is none the less actively operating, and assign cause to external authority/reality while retaining judgement as an expression of a unique and subjecting 'mind'.

Just as the Universe can be seen in many spectra - so is it communicating instantly as charged relations in all its parts, for energy is a carrier for information, and resonant circuitry attunes to serve relevant function. Relevant and relevant to what? To the magnetic desire that attracts purpose of fulfilment. That Existence includes awareness of existence is inherent to All That Is.

The idea of life OUTSIDE Human bounds is an ongoing disclosure. The desire to expand meets the fear of loss of 'control'. Trying to determine the truth of something is different from opening to what is already true but unrecognised. The revealing of the false defences around a sense of self-dissociation, is part of releasing of the idea of control as fearful inhibition and substitution.

That which communicates is the nature of a real relationship. Using others to get from is some kind of contractual social personification of a sense of lack and being thus driven to survive in its terms.