Interesting that you strip all the competitors back to just their flash portfolios to enhance the compare. The article is about the company performance. Pure is a storage company (that just happened to only do flash) so why aren't you comparing it with the overall storage performance of other companies. Also interesting that the 2 'poor' performers you pick out are Dell who are admittedly tanking, and HPE which grew 24% yoy. And you call out IBM as a success (7% growth I think after 22 quarters of decline), and Netapp (8% growth I think). Interesting conclusion you arrived at!
Biting the hand that feeds IT
