Re: What did people expect to see?
Jesus, what are you smoking?
It's clearly a selective Republican release designed to desperately provide cover to Trump, it even shoots itself in the foot when it reveals that the Steele dossier wasn't the actual source of the original surveillance request regarding Page but you missed that part out didn't you.
The problem *you have* is that this release does nothing to actually undermine the surveillance as being legitimately requested.
No-one other that the desperate fools on Faux News are claiming that the Steele dossier was the sole justification for the surveillance, plus large parts of the claims in it have been proven to be true.
To use your 'logic', the police shouldn't investigate a murder because the witness belongs to a different political party or didn't like the accused, so they should dismiss any evidence that the witness has no matter how compelling.
The same FBI that publicly stated it was going to re-open the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, literally days before the election, or did you forget that too?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
