Reply to post: Re: Kim Jong-un

Anti-missile missile misses again, US military mum on meaning of mess

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Kim Jong-un

"I would say the absolute best defence the USA can have at the moment is getting rid of that antagonistic POTUS (POS) and put someone in place that has a level of intelligence and diplomacy."

Oh really? Like that has worked for the last 50 years? Which POTUS did that work for? Nobel Prize winners Jimmy Carter or Barak Obama? Or how about the venerated and reasonable Bill Clinton? NKorea didn't get these nukes and missiles in the last year. They got them while the U.S. had "antagonistic POTUS (POS) and put someone in place that has a level of intelligence and diplomacy" IN OFFICE.

So what you suggest hasn't worked for 50 years, but you push that FAILED narrative anyway, against a POTUS you don't like, though the POTUS's you DID like failed utterly. You have a bit of a logic gap. Diplomacy has and will fail unless applied by China and Russia. It has nothing whatsoever to do with Trump.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019