Reply to post: Re: Even the 6502

FYI: Processor bugs are everywhere – just ask Intel and AMD

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Even the 6502

"I won't downvote you for the inaccuracy because it is shockingly common.

The 68000 was a 32 bit processor with a 16 bit data bus"

It wasn't really.

Although it had 32 bit registers it only had a 16 bit ALU. The 8086 also has a 16 bit ALU and is considered a 16 bit processor. The RCA 1802 had 16 bit registers and an 8 bit ALU and is considered 8 bit. As a computer, the really important thing is the ALU width. When we benchmarked the current version of the 68000 against the NS 16032, which did have a 32 bit ALU, the 16032 absolutely wiped the floor with it on our 32 bit integer arithmetic test set, . National Semi in their marketing always described the 16032 (later the 32016) as the first 32 bit microprocessor for this reason. Acorn used the 16032 as a coprocessor in some of their designs to give "workstation" performance, and it's said that while the series was a bit of a flop, some of its design features eventually made their way to the Pentium.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon