Ha Ha, updating my CV as you read.
Name : Jane (nee John) Doe
When do i start?
If it's any consolation, the white tech guys should be grateful they're not working for the UK's BBC.
I've said before, it used to be "Equal pay for equal work."
On the matter of sports:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-lincolnshire-42604174
This woman was subsequently knocked out, losing two sets to nil. Some male losers lost 3-2. So, ignoring any "quality" of work/effort she worked between 40-66% of the men's efforts.
To be fair to the Darts organisation, they point out that she , and others, have equal OPPORTUNITY to play against the men with the same potential reward. Strange that very, very few, if any ever do.
And as has been seen with snooker, the occasional one that tries is simply not up to the job.
The anomaly is of course, Tennis.
Take Wimbledon, and no doubt the other majors. Best of 3 for the women v best of 5 for the men.
How often do we see a one -sided 6-2.6-1 womens score yet men can lose 6-4,4-6,7-6,6-7,4-6.
15 games v 56 games?
Equal pay for equal work?
Biting the hand that feeds IT
