Reply to post: Re: From a legal perspective... admits porn age checks could harm small ISPs and encourage risky online behaviour

Alan Edwards

Re: From a legal perspective...

No, because it's not "produced solely or principally for the purposes of sexual arousal". The main purpose of a modelling site would be to sell modelling services, if you get your rocks off to it that's your business.

It would be a Rule 34(b) - if it exists, someone will be "into" it. Nothing would survive.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019