Reply to post: Re: 'Most research is sponsored by proprietary software companies, and as such might be biased'

And we return to Munich's migration back to Windows – it's going to cost what now?! €100m!

JimC

Re: 'Most research is sponsored by proprietary software companies, and as such might be biased'

I don't believe its possible to find an independant expert, and for that matter I don't even believe its possible to make a fully informed rational decision about these issues. I always considered it to be an almost religious decision made on faith. Certainly IME that was what was going on where I worked.

But I'm rather of the opinion that if you have your support staffing and training sorted out it probably doesn't matter too much what you use - and if you havn't got your staffing support and training sorted out it probably still doesn't matter.

But as others have said I am sure the key issue will have been support for specialist applications. IME they will be Windows only, and anything away from a pure MS environment will greatly increase the amount of resource you need to put into the specialist apps because the vendors won't. Use different vendors? Its hard enough finding a competent package for these jobs anyway without excluding from consideration all the ones who won't support a multi platform shop. We're there to serve the users and deliver them the best working environment...

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019