Re: I don't get it
> "It depends. If we all get 2.2% more income at the expense of desperately needed social and medical programs, it would be wrong."
Aren't all taxpayer funded social and medical freebies "desperately needed" at ALL times? By your logic we would NEVER get a tax cut, and the only moral thing to do would be to double.. no, triple the tax rates, because the "most vulnerable" amongst us are so very, very desperate.