Reply to post: Re: wagile

So you're 'agile', huh? I do not think it means what you think it means

Andy 73 Silver badge

Re: wagile

"their slow test acceptance process"

The argument is to move their test acceptance process into your continuous deployment process. Easier said than done, but what you're describing is the usual impedance mismatch that comes from a product being used in a situation that itself is not agile.

Sometimes that's a technical problem (how do you test against a client's third party tools), but just as much is a cultural problem (they're just not ready to re-build their test processes). Of course, without solving those problems, 50% of the benefit of agile is immediately lost - which is a cost to them, albeit a hidden one.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon