Re: Now that's a good looking bloke ...
Mr Chaudri, with that attitude to women, no wonder you must have to think this way.
That attitude applies from somewhere around 30M, not 300K. Once you get into that bracket you can definitely consider this:
http://www.thedailymash.co.uk/features/are-you-in-a-mixed-attractiveness-relationship-20171113139015
or this:
https://despair.com/products/love
Gold-diggers are a fact of life. So is the fact that they are predominantly female. It is simply a consequence from the fact that most money is with ugly, prostate case males above 50. Just look at Trump's cabinet's and their wives for an example.
However, in order to get into that category you should be looking at M per year, not 300K. At 300K$ an ugly fat AI researcher will find a matching ugly fat AI researcher. That is also a fact of life.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
