Reply to post:

Man prosecuted for posting a picture of his hobby on Facebook

Adam 52 Silver badge

There's no suggestion of evidence tampering. Merely that the photo was presented without the comments.

The article is also inconsistent and a broken evidence chain, or at least reckless about what conclusions might be drawn from it, almost as if the author is intentionally trying to mislead to reader.

I suspect there is more to this than we're being told, and I think we're being told the facts selectively in order to present one version.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019