Reply to post: Re: It beings.

Daily Stormer binned by yet another registrar, due to business risks

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: It beings.

Sure they are but they are being forced to by the majority, they don't have a choice because if they do they would quickly go out of business.

What if a devout Catholic was running a hosting company and refused to host any websites related to <insert something Catholics have issues with>? Then someone announces it on social media.

Would that be ok as well or would this majority force them to or put them out of business?

At the end of the day it's mob rule and someone has to stand up to it before it gets out of hand.

It's censorship by the majority to what they don't like and it won't end well.

I really don't understand why people don't understand this concept? Just wait till you get a political party that ticks all your boxes then the fun is really going to start.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019