Re: I don't mine a skeptic. I prefer a skeptic in this position
"The worst case would be someone in charge that is a denier or a believer"
Regardless, the subject (CAGW) is in effect, an apocalyptic religion. So, what exactly is wrong with denying (dis-believing) that religion's extreme and unproven tenets? After all, anyone not in the Church is automatically labelled a "denier," so if you exclude that group you are left with only believers.
Not that I accept that the pejorative "denier" has any legitimacy in civilized discourse, mind you.