Reply to post: Re: I don't mine a skeptic. I prefer a skeptic in this position

Climate-change skeptic lined up to run NASA in this Trump timeline

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: I don't mine a skeptic. I prefer a skeptic in this position

"The worst case would be someone in charge that is a denier or a believer"

Regardless, the subject (CAGW) is in effect, an apocalyptic religion. So, what exactly is wrong with denying (dis-believing) that religion's extreme and unproven tenets? After all, anyone not in the Church is automatically labelled a "denier," so if you exclude that group you are left with only believers.

Not that I accept that the pejorative "denier" has any legitimacy in civilized discourse, mind you.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019