Reply to post: forced arbitration

Sorry, but those huge walls of terms and conditions you never read are legally binding

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

forced arbitration

This, chums, is why forced arbitration should be illegal.

But would your opinion be the same if the test case (and especially the defendant) changed? For example, would you be in favour of mandatory arbitration as the last-ditch measure for the public-sector (or more broadly, essential-service privider) employment contract negotiations, together with a ban on using both strikes and lockouts as a negotiating tactic?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon