Reply to post: Re: Diversity for Diversity's sake?

Your top five dreadful people the Google manifesto has pulled out of the woodwork

JcRabbit

Re: Diversity for Diversity's sake?

> It is absolutely ridiculous to say that "women" "prefer social jobs"

Why is it ridiculous if it is true? Read my comment above about Sweden. What is ridiculous is trying to fit men and women into the same box by force, like you and many others are trying to do. I'm all for equal rights, but at the same time you have to admit that women and men ARE different. And for very good reasons.

> 2. I don't agree that Google should have fired him. They should have seen it as an opportunity to learn and to teach on a topic that is clearly very difficult to handle and talk about. Google screwed up by not taking that opportunity.

See, here I agree with you. But when you start an argument by calling people you do not agree with as 'dreadful people'... hmmm. :-P

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019