Reply to post: Re: Some change was necessary

Slapping crap bosses just got cheaper: Blighty's Supreme Court nixes tribunal fees

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Some change was necessary

I think the only way it can be completely fair is if there's a screening process first - get your case past a judge before you're even allowed to raise the prospect of a court case with the potential defendant.

However that would be bloody expensive.

Maybe getting the case past a non-judge judge. If it fails you have to pay to go further, if not it's free?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon