Reply to post: Re: That's a bad idea

Wannacry: Everything you still need to know because there were so many unanswered Qs

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: That's a bad idea

I'm sure you meant the eejit? That guy is using the network aiming for unauthorised access (probe firewall). The op is talking about if he/she was the "the client's network guy". How is the client's network guy at fault for touching things on his own network?

It's like if an IT guy sets up a router that disable all unauthorised device connected to the router. How it is the IT guy doing stuff with "unauthorised access" when it is his network?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019