Reply to post: Takedown doesn't work

US court decision will destroy the internet, roar Google, Facebook et al

Mark 110

Takedown doesn't work

Isn't the crrux of this that takedown has failed. Having the thing taken down doesn't get the copyright holder paid for the use of the content before it got taken down.

Shouldn't the law read more along the lines of there being clear civil penalties for publishing copyright infringing content. Damages commensurate with expected reasonable earnings for said infringement.

It would need to be very clearly clarified (sic) who is infringing, and therefore liable:

- the service provider (E.g. Facebook)

- the user (E.g. Tom, Dick, Harry, Theresa, Donna, Hortense) using the service

The copyright holder would like it to be the big corporate - easier to collect.

The big corporate would like it to be the user - so they can not give fcuk.

Do we end up with a scenario (a la Pirate Bay) where ISPs are required to block Facebook as it distributes illegal content?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019