Reply to post:

US court decision will destroy the internet, roar Google, Facebook et al

Charles 9 Silver badge

It wasn't mentioned specifically, but isn't one of the argument that, because the text of the Act doesn't specifically cater to the actions in question, that the Act must therefore be amended and that the responsibility for doing that doesn't fall to the Courts (who are supposed to interpret the law, not make it) but to Congress? What's the argument for and against such an approach?

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019