An article for El Reg to be ashamed of
If you were expecting a sensible description and some thoughtful analysis of the Princeton work ... I guess you'll look somewhere else. The article contains a brief non-explanation, an almost context-free screenshot and then a bunch of woolly pseudo-criticisms that smell exactly like a bloke propping up the bar saying "If I don't understand this technical stuff, it can't be any good". Shoddy "journalism".