"We don't believe that censoring the existence of ISIS on Google, YouTube or social media will dampen their impact really," said Google's chief counsel David Drummond. "We have to reach at-risk youth all over the world and divert them from hate and radicalisation."
Why does he think those two things are mutually exclusive?
Isn't it better to censor* and reach out to at-risk youths?
*You can argue that censorship is bad, but so is getting hit by flying body parts.