Reply to post: Re: "not part of his defence strategy"?

Lawyer defending arson suspect flees court with pants on fire

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: "not part of his defence strategy"?

"If he did do it deliberately" - then it's surely contempt of court, plus charges of his own for arson around in court. If he is charged with contempt, then if it wasn't deliberate his forensics experts will be able to recreate the events. With cameras present.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019