When is an insurer not an insurer?
"...if a vehicle is insured with an insurer, the insurer is responsible for the insured losses?"
Well, there's also this snippet from the article...
"Insurers would not be liable for damages stemming from accidents caused by 'automated vehicles' if the vehicle has not been insured."
...which seems like a rhetorical tautology.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
