Reply to post:

Anti-smut law dubs PCs, phones 'pornographic vendor machines', demands internet filters

phuzz Silver badge
Childcatcher

"a written warning about the dangers of deactivating the filters"

Er, what dangers would these be? I suppose one could argue that the lower end smut sites might host malvertising etc. but in my experience the more reputable pron sites don't have advertising, and generally hold themselves to higher standards than a lot of mainstream sites.

Unless they mean "moral dangers", in which case I'm going to need the dangers explaining to me at length...

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon