Interesting how the reply to ElReg is set in the present tense "have access", rather than a much more encompassing "ever had access".
From what is written here, they are not denying anything of what happened in the past.
Interesting how the reply to ElReg is set in the present tense "have access", rather than a much more encompassing "ever had access".
From what is written here, they are not denying anything of what happened in the past.