Re: Why try to 'convince' creationists?
> There is also evidence - or at least debate - that the theory as propounded by Darwin is wrong in some at some least respects. I'm thinking specifically about gradual change over long periods.
That is because Darwin's 'natural selection' is not the only process happening, and this was recognised by Darwin. He also saw that there was 'sexual selection' as a process that would operate over long time periods. It is not that "Darwin is wrong in some at some least respects", it is that other processes _also_ occur.