Reply to post: Re: Who Needs Programmers When You Need Hardware Designers?

Microsoft boffins: Who needs Intel CPUs when you've got FPGAs?

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Who Needs Programmers When You Need Hardware Designers?

> a seamless FPGA/cpu application programming language needs to allow the programmer to express their real world problem in a "natural" way that suits the context.

This is the problem! The C-design entry approaches are based on expression in a sequential language.

We don't seem to be able to tear ourselves away from using C (as the lowest common denominator) for all purposes whether appropriate or not.

A colleague suggested Lucid as the best approach yet to an algorithmic language for FPGAs. And it does look like a good fit - only that no-one seems to have taken it beyond a language-interpreter.

Now I'm off to cry in a corner because great new languages never get any traction...

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019