Reply to post: Re: RE 'Yes, I was just reading the same quote in disbelief.'

Sex ban IT man loses appeal – but judge labels order 'unpoliceable'

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: RE 'Yes, I was just reading the same quote in disbelief.'

'If there are questions, address them by an independent review. He should be entitled to that.'

Why? An appeal court with a different judge looked over the original case, heard his appeal and upheld the order. The judge made a statement on his character to support the judgement along with questioning the effectiveness of the existing order. Why would making a statement on character be unprofessional? Both the original judge and the appeals judge felt compelled to make similar statements regarding character, presumably as this is significant in the requirement for the order. Its a thankless job being a judge. The appeal judge is due to make a further review of the order next month.

Do we just keep lining up independent reviews with all the associated costs until he gets a result he wants? It's not as if he is incarcerated? If he is homeless then he has a direct hand in that.

You are being played.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019