Re: "He was found not guilty, therefore he is innocent"
So effectively, the SRO eradicates any presumption of innocence? If he had been convicted, many measures could have been applied, i.e., incarceration, restraining orders, etc.
But if this person was found innocent, why is he still being punished for crimes he has not yet committed (or may have committed in the past, but for which he has not been arrested)? Apparently, that is OK now in the UK. And if he is indeed into S&M, leather and edgy sexual behavior, there are undoubtedly peers within the elite who are too. Shouldn't they all be wearing ankle bracelets 24/7?
You can slice this anyway you like, it still looks very fucked up.
What is next?
Bans on transgens entering certain areas (think toilets), global surveillance of "suspect" categories of people (think muslims, shouty Reg commentards, parking violators, sexual deviants, porn watchers....).
Don't say it can't happen. The authorities have the technology and will soon use it however they see fit. TM looks like she is well off on a mission to fully purify UK society. Good luck to you if you don't meet all the purity criteria.
If this still isn't clear to you, re-watch Brazil and Demolition Man for some mental re-adjustment.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
