And if this chap had been accused of terrorist activities, but...?
If he had been accused and arrested but the case fell apart, but the Police felt he was a wrong-un and the best way to stop him was to be in his face and restrict him every possible way, many of the 'tards here would have felt, for the greater safety of society, that this was beyond the law but, you know, pretty acceptable in this instance.
Could it be that the Police feel that he is a wrong-un and this is how they are getting in his face?
Do I think it is right? I'm not sure. We've heard his side of it and I'd like to hear the Police's side, although we never will. But from what I hear from him, everyone's mean to him and he is innocent, so so innocent. Hmmmm.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
