Re: Timeline of the Indictment is odd
Yeh, 11. the Observer Magazine article on anonymous hacker 'nsh'. We know from Snowden that GCHQ have 'anonymous hackers' as a target and so would have done a filter on 'nsh' and read everyone emails, chats etc. Anything that their 'nsh' filter threw up. So if you accidentally used 'nsh' then GCHQ would have read your private conversation.
So the chat they list on 10 would have been thrown up by that filter and would likely be the first 'nsh' that actually was useful in that filter.
Which would have then caused them to get the the 'anon' email address, which in turn would have given them 'love'. Which then kicked off the fake evidence trail listed here.
Which means the courts are being fed a load of shit.
All illegal of course, which is why Toxic Theresa is trying to legalize it. That prosecutor (from the previous Love story) who mentioned a secret informant who logged the chat and passed it to the FBI, he's iffy on it too. He wouldn't have mentioned it, it if didn't bug him. I think if 'nsh' lawyers concentrate on this chat that was intercepted it might one of those Snowden moments. Where we realize how much horsemeat is in the sausage.
Biting the hand that feeds IT
