Reply to post: Re: According to Mr. Orlowski

Why Oracle will win its Java copyright case – and why you'll be glad when it does

Indolent Wretch

Re: According to Mr. Orlowski

But here's the question.

Since those 11K lines of code are what define the interface and the way it interacts.

That means it's impossible to reimplement the interface without "copying" (it wasn't a copy and much of it was made by machine but blah blah) those 11K lines of code.

So Oracle are saying nobody can write something that is interoperable with our stuff.

Nobody can write a drop in replacement for our stuff.

Nobody can compete with our stuff this way, any competitor has to be completely different.

As people have pointed out, Lotus v Borland was supposed to have sorted this years ago.

Being able to copyright 'headers' (instructions) is a terrible thing and I say this as a developer horrified by the way this case is going and by the idiots higher up throwing out Judge Alsups perfectly sensible and tech savvy original judgement.

You may as well use copyright to stop a guy from writing a blog piece that explains what the buttons do on a SKY remote.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY TECH NEWSLETTER

Biting the hand that feeds IT © 1998–2019