Reply to post: Re: Bull

Ad-blocker blocking websites face legal peril at hands of privacy bods

Anonymous Coward
Anonymous Coward

Re: Bull

>Your proposed solutions do not scale well and are using the resources very inefficiently.

>Such a change would also kill the biggest players in the field (like Google)

It was Google I was thinking of - in traffic terms Google (CloudFlare) is already serving the ads, the publisher content and click-thru targets now in billions of instances daily.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon