Reply to post: DO-178, IC makers liability

AI no longer needs to fake it. Just don't try talking to your robots

JeffyPoooh
Pint

DO-178, IC makers liability

Impose the requirement for DO-178 documentation, as it should be. Being obviously life-critical. That'll slow 'em down a bit. How do they plan to document the 'machine learning' sub-systems? Hopefully somebody imposes some adult supervision into this industry before they're let loose.

Have the chip makers signed-off on this application? They're in danger of being pulled into any product failure liability lawsuits. A failed chip, self-driving car mows down children. Could get expensive. Will they impose standards for 'screened' parts?

These sorts of issues will delay this for at least a decade beyond what some people seem to think.

POST COMMENT House rules

Not a member of The Register? Create a new account here.

  • Enter your comment

  • Add an icon

Anonymous cowards cannot choose their icon